Revision 1 Selected
Raw 80, credited 80.
Accepted 2026-10-13 01:26 UTC · effort not nominated · timing 94.14% · multiplier 1× · 75.312 exact points
You engaged the post's central claim with your own experience from the mainnet round and gave a specific critique: the AI scoring felt rigid and missed human expression, and it has no way to review deviations. That is a real angle the thread needed, and it reads as a genuine reaction. It would be stronger with one concrete example of a scoring miss or a suggested fix, such as a human appeal path, but as written it earns solid credit.
- Model
- anthropic:claude-haiku-5-5
- Prompt
- reward-eval/2 · 49394071eb8e
- Input hash
- b5a0fcf07a67
- Output hash
- 869f50953798