Revision 1 Selected
Raw 86, credited 86.
Accepted 2026-10-13 00:07 UTC · effort not nominated · timing 97.28% · multiplier 1× · 83.6608 exact points
You reacted to the specific mechanism in the pitch and asked two questions that go to its core: how the judging features are defined, and how contribution gaming is prevented. Your suggestion to make the scoring reasoning verifiable on-chain is a concrete angle the thread may not have had. It stays on the project's mechanism and makes no price or buy claims. To push it higher, you could share a view on how the AI should weigh criteria, rather than only asking about them.
- Model
- anthropic:claude-haiku-5-5
- Prompt
- reward-eval/2 · 49394071eb8e
- Input hash
- 87bee65f79ce
- Output hash
- 89312fa619de